Features like Ebany fret board and bridge, scalloped braces, nice inlays, etc.
How do they compare in cost?
I know that this is a persomall choice type of thing but with none close to me that I can play, I need your thoughts on them.
Thanks,
TMG.
| Author | Comment | ||
|---|---|---|---|
TaylorMartinGuild.theunofficialma... |
Stanford or Eastman? |
Lead | |
|
Which one is the best Dred with solid spruce top and solid rosewood B&S.
Features like Ebany fret board and bridge, scalloped braces, nice inlays, etc. How do they compare in cost? I know that this is a persomall choice type of thing but with none close to me that I can play, I need your thoughts on them. Thanks, TMG. |
|||
Pappy |
|||
|
Sounds like a question for Dave our mod. He just came off a trip playing Eastman dreads and he owns a Perfomer. He will come trundling by eventually. If not
give him a PM
So many guitars....So little time.
So many taxes......So few guitars
|
|||
Broadus55.acousticfingers... |
|||
|
A couple of guys have played or owned both, so I'm sure they'll chime in. I suspect it may depend on the type of sound you're after. My
understanding is that Eastman produces a more "modern" sound and the Stanford is more "vintage." I've only strummed a Stanford and that
was several months ago and I wasn't paying that much attention to it. It's a fine guitar, though.
Also, the neck profile is a consideration. The Eastman is, IMO, a medium-sized C profile. The Stanford neck has been described as a soft V. It's a little thick for some but perfect for others. Hope you the best in your search. I've already told you more than I know! Bill
Broadus on AGF, HCAG, and the Larrivee Forum
Eastman AC710S The chief end of man is to glorify God and enjoy him forever (Westminster Shorter Catechism, 1647) |
|||
rlouie.theunofficialma... |
|||
Broadus55 wrote: this post is spot on......................I owned an Eastman AC720 and it had more of a Taylor sound with less bass response and I now own a few Stanfords and prefer them much more as they have a Martinesque vintage sound with a much better bass response................ |
|||
Broadus55.acousticfingers... |
|||
|
I don't know how the dreads compare, and guitars can vary from one to another, but comparing my Eastman OM to my Larrivee OM, the Eastman had noticeably
more bass and volume than the Larri and more bass than my friend's Taylor 314ce (larger grand auditorium). I really have trouble describing the Eastman
sound. It's not a "trebly" as a Taylor but has more bass presence than a Larrivee.
I would love to be able to compare a Stanford OM with an Eastman OM, but it's pretty difficult to find both. Whichever way one goes, though, one will have a fine guitar. Bill
Broadus on AGF, HCAG, and the Larrivee Forum
Eastman AC710S The chief end of man is to glorify God and enjoy him forever (Westminster Shorter Catechism, 1647) |
|||
dmcowles |
|||
|
As has been said, it really depends on whether you want a vintage voiced guitar, or one with a more contemporary sound. The Stanfords and Eastmans both have
fine appointments, and excellent fit and finish. Stanfords are vintage voiced. Eastmans have a more contemporary sound, with an element of tasty archtop
elegance built into the voices of the flattops. Whether you get ebony board and bridge will depend on which model level you get. Eastmans are quite simple but
classy in their appearance, with very little seashell salad on them.
You forget it and I'll forget it, but I'll remember it, and don't you forget it!
|
|||
intune66 |
|||
|
How about nut width, guys? Stanford's is 1-3/4". Is Eastman's as well? The Stanford neck contour is full without being chunky. Not as big around
as the Recording King RD-227 by any means. The Stanford tone is surprisingly vintage with lots of low end but nice treble. They are great strummers. Sure wish
I could play an Eastman for sake of comparison......
Ryan
_____________________ Some of my Guitars: Stanford PSD-28, 21, 20 Blueridge BR-70, 60-AS Aria AD-80, R.K. RDC-57 |
|||
Broadus55.acousticfingers... |
|||
|
Nut width for all Eastman flat tops evidently is 1 3/4" (according to their spec pages) and the bridge string spacing is 2 3/16". The rosewood OM
that I have is great for strumming or fingerstyle, so I would expect the dread to be a great strummer.
The spec pages, though, incorrectly have the scale length at 25.5". All Eastman flat tops, according to an Eastman rep, are 25". Concerning Stanfords and "chunky necks," chunky is in the hand of the beholder. I used to think Seagull necks were chunky until my friend loaned me his unused S6 dread to keep in my office for a while. I find its neck very comfortable, and I have medium-sized hands at best. Bill
Broadus on AGF, HCAG, and the Larrivee Forum
Eastman AC710S The chief end of man is to glorify God and enjoy him forever (Westminster Shorter Catechism, 1647)
Last Edited By: Broadus55
07/01/09 02:02 PM.
Edited 1 times.
|
|||
dmcowles |
|||
|
The Eastman necks are very comfortable. They're not snake-slim like the Blueridge, and not quite as full as Stanfords, IMO. They are very playable,
regardless of any previous preferences you may have had.
You forget it and I'll forget it, but I'll remember it, and don't you forget it!
|
|||
pugsleydorite.theunofficialma... |
|||
|
I own a couple of Stanford dreads and have played several Eastman dreads. The detail in the build quality and finish on the Eastman's are
exceptional(almost boutique quality) while the Stanford finish and build is also really good. I would give Eastman the nod on build quality and finish. The
necks on Eastman's are wide but not a fuller profile as the Stanford necks. Playability of both necks are exceptional. The way to describe the tone is that
Eastman is more refined while Stanford has that "in your face" boom that bluegrassers like me love. I would give Stanford the edge for being a
bluegrass guitar. However, I did play one Eastman AC520 which was unbelievable in tone and it had that boom needed for bluegrass. It was the only Eastman dread
I played that even came anywhere close to Stanford dreads as being a good bluegrass guitar. I feel you can't go wrong with either brand. If you like that
"boom" from a guitar , then get a Stanford. If you are looking for a more refined tone and less boom, then get an Eastman.
|
|||
gypsyjazzguitars |
|||
|
Broken in Eastman dread. That's my vote. Keep in mind that the bass on a guitar disappears in real life, it's only for the player. As soon as a string
bass comes in, I can't hear the guitar bass. If you don't have a bass playing along, then that's a different matter. The Stanford might cut a
little more. The sensitivity and response of the Eastman pleases me more.
But you really can't go wrong.
|
|||
cibby53 |
|||
|
I have 2 Eastmans one is a new AC 320 The other is a AC415 Jumbo both have 1 3/4in nut widths. The older AC 415 jumbo has a solid spruce top and solid
rosewood back and sides it does sound more like a Taylor.. The new AC 320 has solid mahogany back and sides with a solid sitka spruce top and this one sounds
so close to a D18 Martin you could close your eyes and here both and you can't tell which is which. This will save my D18 some wear. Plus the AC320 looks
great Dennis put on a nice pickgaurd. I was expecting it to sound like a Taylor but this AC 320 sounds like a Martin. Not sure how other ones sound maybe I got
lucky..
|
|||
rvanderhule |
|||
|
TMG, I traded for an Eastman AC720 from a guy in this group about a month ago and I live down the road here in Layton. You would be welcome to come over and
give it a play sometime. Give me a call.
Ron Vanderhule 801 726 8554 |
|||
intune66 |
|||
rvanderhule wrote: Nice! That's as good an answer as any. I remember that guitar from the classifieds.
Ryan
_____________________ Some of my Guitars: Stanford PSD-28, 21, 20 Blueridge BR-70, 60-AS Aria AD-80, R.K. RDC-57 |
|||
gypsyjazzguitars |
|||
|
They're really quite different between the two in general character, and the difference between mahogany and rosewood is also pronounced in both lines.
Eastman gives the option of choosing Sitka or Engelmann. I like chords on Sitka, but there's something about single line on Engelmann. Too many choices,
glad I don't have time to mess with guitars from the playing side, I'd never get things settled!!!!
|
|||
TaylorMartinGuild.theunofficialma... |
|||
rvanderhule wrote: Ron, I sent you a message, TMG |
|||